农村金融生态环境与金融效率指标体系构建及互动分析

分别建立农村金融生态环境和金融效率评价指标体系,并从理论上分析二者的互动机制。然后运用Granger因果检验法,对1985-2008年农村金融生态环境和金融效率关系进行实证分析,结果显示二者存在Granger因果关系,建议通过优化农村金融生态环境来促进金融效率提高,并带来自身进一步改善。     

论经济法视角下的自然垄断行业的法律规制

自然垄断行业在各国从管制到放松的发展,而我国自然垄断行业又呈现出独有的特征。因此,对自然垄断行业的法律规制,应该立足我国国情,从立法上完善,深化我国的经济体制改革。     

股权制衡、法律保护与股改对价

本文利用股改公司的样本数据,检验了股权制衡与股改对价的关系以及法律保护机制对此的影响,结果发现：投资者对股权制衡型的公司会要求较低的对价水平,且股权制衡程度越大,对价水平越低;然而,这种负相关关系仅在公司所处地区法律保护程度较高时成立;这表明法律保护机制是影响股权制衡能否发挥积极作用的关键因素之一。     

山西省实施“以煤补农”机制的分析

从经济发展与资源环境生态矛盾突出的实际出发,建立“以煤补农”的政策机制,鼓励煤炭企业支持和参与所在地区的新农村建设成为必然趋势。本文将新农村建设中的“以煤补农”机制和“环境经济”紧密结合,分析了山西省煤炭煤业发展和农业发展的不协调性,提出实施“以煤补农”机制的基本思路。对山西省寻求一种社会的公平发展;增强农业基本资源和生产条件的可持续性;遵循环境一经济系统发展规律具有现实的意义。     

森林资产流转法律制度研究

以中国现行森林资产流转法律制度为研究对象,对资源管理法(公法)模式,民法(私法)模式,混合(公法为主,私法为辅或私法为主,公法为辅)模式进行分析,指出不同制度模式下对森林多种价值调整的不平衡性导致森林保护法律制度功能的弱化,提出在对森林资源按其功能、经营目的划分成不同森林类型的基础上,再按不同功能的森林分别采取公法(保障),私法(激励)的方式构建法律制度,方能实现法律制度对森林资产流转调整的理想目标。     

Does research applying the DPSIR framework support decision making?

The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework was developed in the late 1990s to structure and organize indicators in a meaningful way. Since then, the framework has increasingly been applied in research projects with the aim of supporting decision making. A number of attributes of the framework regarding structuring and communication issues in research further strengthen its original purpose of bridging the science policy gap. We reviewed several studies that were mainly concerned with criticism and drawbacks of the DPSIR framework. Based on these studies and our own experiences in applying the DPSIR framework in an EU project to develop a decision support tool, we developed two criteria that we believe are crucial for policy relevant research: (a) the development of conceptual models integrating knowledge from different disciplines, specialists and policy makers, as well as those affected by their decisions; and (b) the potential to explain the results and analysis of research to different disciplines, specialists, stakeholders and the public and to demonstrate alternatives and provide decision options. We analyzed 21 studies using the DPSIR framework with regard to their relevance for decision making. We analyzed the definitions of the five DPSIR elements and whether specific end users were addressed in the respective studies. We found that in many studies, the DPSIR elements were defined in literature review or by researchers and that only a few studies targeted specific government authorities as users of research results. Eight out of 21 studies applied transdisciplinary research concepts and integrated broad ranges of stakeholder opinions and values into the research. Nine out of 21 studies presented alternative outcomes to decision makers and used the valuation of these outcomes by stakeholders to add further support to the decision-making process. The different positive and negative implications of the DPSIR framework are discussed with reference to research that supports policy making. Finally, we conclude that studies employing DPSIR may provide effective solutions for “real world problems” by taking into account additional criteria based on knowledge integration, stakeholder involvement and the provision of alternatives. Therefore, DPSIR is a useful tool to support decision making by means of showing solid evidence with alternatives and decision options, rather than by presenting predetermined solutions.     

Compliance and market exclusion in Brazilian agriculture: Analysis and implications for “soft” governance

“Soft” or “hybrid” governance holds considerable promise in attempts to reconfigure state-market-society relationships toward improved environmental outcomes. “Soft” governance processes in Brazil's globally competitive, high-input/output agriculture sector have major implications for landuse policies. Here we identify and analyze two emergent processes, a compliance regime and bioregion-based market exclusion approach, that stand out amid a background of conflicts between agricultural land uses and environmental regulation. We address the effectiveness of “soft” governance, using a framework that focuses on interactions among state and non-state actors, use of geographic information, relations to global processes, and discourse. These policies may play an important role in bridging the divide between environmental and agricultural interests, but market and state actors, and the uneven effects of globalization, will influence effectiveness. Our framework for analyzing governance processes should complement future work that directly measures environmental outcomes.     

论法官的依法裁判——兼论法教义学方法对法官裁判的意义

在司法实践中,法官裁判工作屡屡遭遇社会舆论、民意导向和政策要求的严重干扰,影响了司法公正。法教义学强调法律文本的权威,强调对现有法律的执行,是法官裁判过程中摆脱困境的一条根本出路。法教义学方法并不否定法官自由裁量权,而是对其进行合理的控制与规范。为达到以法教义学方法进行依法裁判的目的,必须在法官思维的养成、促使法官严格依法解释上下功夫,同时为法官创造良好的适用法教义学方法裁判的外部环境。     

论保险业非诉调解及其效力

在加强和创新社会管理、构建和谐社会的背景下,崇尚并运用非诉调解方式化解保险合同纠纷,尤为必要和迫切。非诉调解蕴含多元的法理价值,包括自由、秩序、公正和效率等。保险业运用人民调解、行业调解和行政调解等非诉调解机制,深入实践并积极探索,妥善化解矛盾纠纷。应当建立完善保险业非诉调解协议效力司法确认机制,构建保险业多元化大调解格局,加大政策支持和宣传力度,充分发挥非诉调解的法律效力和综合效应。     

区域创新能力、农业经济与生态环境协调发展关系研究

首先,建立4种空间权重矩阵,运用Moran′I检验证实了农业生态环境空间相关性;其次,构建基于库兹涅茨曲线的空间计量模型,将区域创新能力纳入研究框架,运用2005-2013年我国内地31个省份面板数据实证分析区域创新能力、农业经济与生态环境协调发展关系,并对各影响因素空间效应进行分解;最后,对统计结果进行稳健性检验。结果表明,我国农村经济发展与生态环境间呈正U型曲线关系,而区域创新能力提升将显著改善农业生态环境,并进一步促进我国农业经济可持续发展。